Count the adults in a school-age child’s Tuesday. The two parents. The grandmother at the door. The auto driver who comes at half past seven. The watchman at the school gate. The class teacher at nine. The PT teacher at ten. The maths tutor at four. The neighbour on the stairs at half past six. The cousin’s wife in the kitchen at dinner. The paediatrician on Wednesday afternoons, the music teacher’s husband who answers the door on Fridays, the man at the corner dispensary who hands her the medicine. The child is in the presence of more than a dozen adults before her lunchbox is opened.
When India talks about preventing harm to that child, it talks to two of them. The mother, and after a long pause, the father. The workshop is for them. The pocket card is for their bag. The headline question, when something goes wrong, is what should parents do, and only ever that. We have built almost everything we know about preventing child sexual abuse around the assumption that the protection is a household’s job, and that the household is roughly the size of two adults.
It is not.
This essay is about the wider adulthood India has all along, and has consistently asked too little of. The teacher with a child for six hours a day. The paediatrician with her for ten minutes a year. The auto driver alone with her, twice a day. The watchman who knows every face that crosses his gate. The neighbour on the stairs. The cousin’s wife in the kitchen. The grandparent at the door. The ring of adults a child lives inside, that has never been asked to think of itself as cast.
The work was never a household’s. It was always a ring’s. We have only not said the word at the kitchen table.
The household we made into the world
When the country talks about child sexual abuse prevention, it speaks to the parent. The training is for the parent. The leaflet is for the parent. The reporter calls the parent for comment. When something goes wrong, the question on the table is what should parents do, and only ever that. The parent has been made the whole conversation, and the parent has been left to carry it alone.
This is a small lie India tells itself, told warmly. The lie is that the home is the whole world a child lives in. It is not. A school-age Indian child spends most of her waking hours in the presence of adults who are not her parents, and a great deal of the harm she might come to comes from inside those same hours. The National Crime Records Bureau, which counts only the cases that ever reach a police station, has found year after year that the accused was someone the child already knew in roughly ninety-six per cent of the cases registered under the POCSO Act. The country’s own Study on Child Abuse, conducted by the Ministry of Women and Child Development in 2007 and still the largest of its kind, found that a great deal of that harm came from someone in a position of trust. A relative. A neighbour. A tutor. A driver. A teacher. A cook. A friend of the family the household had every reason to welcome. Position of trust is a category many times the size of a parent.
So when we frame prevention as something parents do, two things happen at once. We put a load on parents that no two people can carry. And we tell every other adult in the ring that the work is not theirs to do.
Both of those failures are quiet. Neither is anyone’s fault. Both are the shape of a conversation that has gone on too long with the wrong number of people in it.
The ring you have not been counting
There is a tool I want to give you. The next time you are with a child you care about, count. Count the adults who will be in front of her in a single day. The teacher who calls roll at nine. The art teacher who comes on Wednesdays. The doctor she goes to in the afternoon because of a stomach ache that keeps returning. The auto driver who knows by sight when her mother is running late at the gate. The grandmother she sits with while her father is at work. The anganwadi worker who knows which of the small ones is quieter this week than last. The piano teacher’s husband who answers the door. The cousin’s wife who is the only other adult in the house when the cousin himself is travelling.
You will get to ten before you have left her own building. You will get to thirty before the day is out. None of them is her parent. Every one of them is on the ring.
The word ring is the right word, because it gathers a shape that family and outsider between them have not been able to hold. The ring is not the household. It is not the system. It is the wide adulthood that touches a child between those two. What other fields have long studied as the social-ecological circle around a child, the working language of Indian households has had no living word for. What is unnamed at the kitchen table is hard to organise, and harder to ask anything of. The ring has not been asked of, because we have not held it in mind as a thing.
It is a thing. It is, in fact, the thing that decides whether a child can tell. A parent can be loving and watchful and still be in the kitchen when something happens at the gate. The adult at the gate is the ring. A child can be brave and articulate and still tell first not in a sentence to her mother at bedtime, but in a flinch when an auto driver leans across her to fix the door. The driver is the ring. We have spent thirty years asking children to bring their telling to a parent, and almost none of that telling, the research keeps reminding us, arrives that way the first time. It arrives sideways, in a moment, to whichever adult is closest. The closest adult is almost never the parent. The ring is who the telling reaches first.
There is a hard fact to put next to all of this, and the essay would be dishonest without it. The same data that names the ring as where a child lives also names the ring as where a great deal of the harm comes from. The position of trust the Study on Child Abuse described, the relative and the neighbour and the tutor and the driver, is the ring. To ask the ring to do this work is also to ask the ring to look honestly at itself. Some of its members are the very people from whom a child needs the ring’s protection. To be in the ring is to carry two vows at once. To be a trusted adult, and not to be a person who harms. The two are not separate; they are the same vow, said in two directions.
What a ring actually does
I want to be careful here, because there is a version of the ring that is wrong, and we should not build the right one by accident.
The wrong ring is the surveillance ring. The adult who watches a child for signs. The adult who scans the building for predators. The adult who sees their place in the ring as a position from which to inspect. That is not the ring. That is fear in costume, and it is the version of adult presence that scares children into telling fewer adults, not more. The right ring does not surveil children. It does learn what to recognise in adults. The grooming pattern, the unusual gift, the time-alone arranged for, the friendship a grown adult pursues with a particular child, are things the field has long taught adults to read in other adults. That is not paranoia. It is informed reading. The line is plain: we do not watch children for symptoms. We do learn what to notice in adults.
The right ring does three smaller, plainer things. It is present, so a child knows it is there. It asks a real question once in a while, in place of how was school. And it receives, when a child says something hard, with belief before sorting.
Presence is the first work, and it is small. A teacher who knows the names of the children at the back row. An anganwadi worker who turns to the child she has not heard speak today. A paediatrician who turns the chair so the child can see her face and not only the parent’s. An auto driver who looks at the child in the back, and says good morning to her, and not only to her mother. A neighbour who, when the child passes on the stairs, says her name. Part of presence is also the shape of the time itself. A child is safer when adults are rarely alone with her for long unbroken stretches. When tutoring happens in a room with a visible window. When sleepovers do not put one adult in charge of one child overnight. When the ride home is shared and not solo. Presence in the room and the shape of the room are the same work.
The question is the second work. How was school is the question that gets you fine. A real question is the one that gets you a fact. Is there anyone in the class you don’t like sitting near. Is there a place in the building you avoid. Is there anyone you wish you didn’t have to see. These questions are not interrogations. They are openings. They are the spaces a half-sentence can come into. Most adults have never been told that they are the ones who hold those spaces open.
The reception is the third work, and it is the one we get wrong most often. A child arrives at an adult with a piece of a sentence, and the adult panics, or cross-examines, or hushes. Each of those is a closed door. The open door is small. Thank you for telling me. I believe you. We will sort this out, and you have not done anything wrong. Then the adult, not the child, carries what comes next. What comes next has a shape too. Do not promise the child you will keep the secret. Do not interrogate her. Do not confront the person she has named, and not in front of her. Keep her in the safest place you can. Write down what she said, in her own words, as soon as you can. And call Childline on 1098. Childline is the first call to make because it stages the response in a trauma-informed way, and routes from there to the police, the Special Juvenile Police Unit, or the Child Welfare Committee as the case requires, so a child is not put through repeated interviews she does not need.
There is a legal duty in here too, and it falls on every member of the ring, not on parents or teachers alone. Under Section 19 of the POCSO Act, any adult who has a reasonable apprehension that an offence under the Act is likely to be committed, or knowledge that one has been, is required to report it. The prospective duty matters as much as the retrospective one. A grandmother who hears a child say she is afraid of a relative’s upcoming visit has a duty to act before the visit, not only after. The paediatrician, the neighbour, the driver, the teacher, the grandmother. The duty is theirs the moment they know. It is the last act in the ring’s work, not the first. Thousands of small acts of presence and asking sit before it. But when the call needs to be made, it is everyone’s to make, and Childline 1098 is the right place to make it from.
Take the place that is already yours
It is worth saying plainly what India has done with the load. We have given an impossible task to the child, which is to recognise and refuse and report an adult she loves and was raised to obey. We have given an impossible task to the parent, which is to be the entire adult world of her child by themselves. And we have allowed every other adult to imagine themselves into a position of being off duty.
None of that was decided in a meeting. It is what happens to a conversation that begins where there is most fear, the child, and ends where there is most authority, the parent, and forgets to draw the line through everyone standing in between. The two ends of the conversation are not wrong. They are only not enough. The line is the ring.
You are on it for at least one child. Probably more than one. You may be a parent, and on it for your own. You may be a teacher, and on it for thirty. You may be a paediatrician on it for hundreds, and an aunt on it for two, and the neighbour to a small girl whose name you do not yet know.
Some readers were that child once, and the ring around them did not hold. This work is not yours to carry alone, and the place you take in any ring now is your own gift to give, slowly if you need to.
This week, find one of the children you are on the ring for, and become the adult she has noticed. Ask her one real question. Tell her, in plain words, that if anything ever feels wrong, she can come to you, and you will believe her first. You do not need a credential. You need a willingness to keep learning, and one sentence said well. Take the place in her ring that was already yours.
We were never a country of two adults and a child. We have always been a ring. We have only been quiet about it. It is time we said it out loud.
If a child is in danger or has been harmed, call Childline on 1098, free, any time of day. For emotional support, KIRAN offers free and confidential counselling on 1800-599-0019, 24x7. This is a hard subject. If it is close to you, you do not have to carry it alone.
Sources